⚓ Stowaway Risk at Remote OPLs: Why “It Never Happened Before” Is Not a Safety Strategy

 ⚓ Stowaway Risk at Remote OPLs:

Why “It Never Happened Before” Is Not a Safety Strategy

🌊 Introduction

In shipping, some of the most dangerous risks are the ones we get comfortable with.

“This port is remote.”
“We’ve loaded here many times.”
“We never had a stowaway incident before.”

This year, while loading bauxite at Boffa OPL, many vessels in our fleet operated far offshore—8 hours by speedboat from land. On paper, the stowaway risk seems negligible. In practice, that assumption deserves a closer look.

Because in maritime operations, absence of past incidents is not proof of future safety.

Let’s talk about this—not emotionally, but professionally. ⚓

 

🚢 1️⃣ Remote OPL ≠ Zero Stowaway Risk

When loading takes place far offshore, it feels secure. No jetty. No terminal crowd. No easy access. Naturally, the belief forms that normal crew stowaway search is sufficient.

But experience teaches us something else.

Stowaways don’t always board during loading.
They board before sailing, during crew changes, with launch boats, or even with unauthorised service craft.

Remote OPLs reduce casual access, but they do not eliminate human intent, desperation, or organised attempts.

Maritime safety history shows us a pattern:
👉 Incidents often happen where we least expect them, precisely because vigilance drops.

A formal stowaway inspection is not about distrust—it is about defensive seamanship.

Hashtags:
#ShipOpsInsights #MaritimeSafety #StowawayRisk #OPLOperations #SeafarerAwareness

 

🧠 2️⃣ The Real Risk Is Not Boarding — It’s Liability

Here is the uncomfortable truth:
Even one stowaway can trigger serious consequences.

• Deviation costs
• Port delays
• Immigration fines
• P&I complications
• Crew stress and investigations

From an Owner’s perspective, the question is not:
“Is the risk low?”

The real question is:
👉 “Can we defend our decision if something goes wrong?”

If an incident occurs and records show that stowaway inspection was waived, the discussion shifts from operations to liability and due diligence.

A standard inspection is not a delay—it is insurance in action.

Good operators don’t just manage ships; they manage risk optics.

Hashtags:
#ShippingLeadership #RiskManagement #MaritimeCompliance #PAndI #ShipOperations

 

🧭 3️⃣ Balance Is the Mark of Professional Seamanship

This is not about mistrust between Charterers and Owners.
It is about balanced operational judgment.

Yes, routine crew stowage search is essential.
Yes, Boffa OPL is remote.
Yes, history shows no incidents so far.

But professional seamanship asks one more thing:
👉 Consistency in safety standards, regardless of convenience.

When inspections are applied uniformly:

• Crews know what to expect
• Owners remain protected
• Charterers avoid future disputes
• Operations stay defensible

Safety culture is not built on exceptions—it is built on discipline.

Hashtags:
#Seamanship #SafetyCulture #MaritimeDiscipline #ShipManagement #OperationalExcellence

 

🧠 Final Thought from ShipOpsInsights

“Most maritime incidents don’t happen because rules exist — they happen because someone believed they were no longer necessary.”

Remote OPLs reduce risk.
They do not eliminate responsibility.

Professional shipping is not about what is convenient today,
but what is defensible tomorrow.

 

📣 Call to Action

If this perspective resonates with your experience at sea or ashore:
👉 Like this post
👉 Comment with your operational view
👉 Share with your fleet or colleagues
👉 Follow ShipOpsInsights with Dattaram for grounded maritime wisdom

Because safer ships are built on clear thinking, not assumptions. ⚓