📚Bunker Sampling Done Right: The Critical Clause Every Shipping Pro Must Master!
❓Think You're Covered During
Bunkering? Think Again!
- Do
     you know which sample is legally binding in a fuel quality dispute?
- Are
     your Chief Engineers actively witnessing bunker sampling?
- Could
     one missing signature cost you thousands in off-spec claims?
🔍Clause Breakdown:
Sampling Protocol in Bunker Delivery
Clause Summary:
“The samples drawn by the supplying barge (and noted on
the BDR) are the only samples considered as representative. The supplier’s
retained sample is final in case of dispute. The vessel must witness sampling,
ensure sealing/signatures, and retain onboard copies.”
⚠️ Implications of This Clause
This clause shifts the burden of proof in bunker
disputes entirely onto the supplier’s retained sample—making it final
and binding. If your crew fails to ensure proper sampling protocols, you
may have no recourse even if the fuel damages your engine.
💡Real-Life Example
A bulk carrier bunkered at Fujairah. Chief Engineer didn't
witness drip sampling nor countersigned the samples. Fuel was off-spec,
damaging injectors. Owner protested. Supplier referred to their retained
sample—found "compliant." Owner lost claim due to procedural failure.
Cost: $145,000 in repairs.
🧩 Common Pitfalls
- Relying
     solely on MARPOL samples (which are for Port State—not commercial
     disputes).
- Skipping
     witnessing of drip sampling.
- No countersignature
     on sealed samples.
- Improper
     use of Cubitainer or flow misadjustments.
✅ Practical Tips
- ALWAYS
     conduct continuous drip sampling witnessed by Chief Engineer or
     trained crew.
- Use
     a clean, calibrated sampling device.
- Keep
     at least one commercial sample per grade onboard.
- Ensure
     samples are 90% full and triple-sealed with signatures from
     both barge and vessel.
- Educate
     crew: BDR sample ≠ MARPOL sample!
⚖️ Legal Backing
- BIMCO
     and INTERTANKO recommend clear sampling procedures in charter
     parties.
- ISO
     8217 & IMO MEPC 182(59) detail fuel and sampling protocols.
- Case
     law supports supplier’s sample if buyer’s procedural evidence is weak.
🚀Actionable Steps for
Shipping Stakeholders
For Ship Operators:
- Train
     crew on sampling SOPs.
- Review
     sampling equipment regularly.
For Managers/Owners:
- Audit
     bunker receipts and sample labels monthly.
- Use checklists
     before/during/after bunkering.
For Charterers:
- Insist
     on transparent sampling clauses in CP.
- Demand
     documentation and photo evidence of the sample process.
📣Conclusion: One Sample
Can Sink the Deal
Never let a technicality cost your company thousands—or your
vessel’s safe voyage. Master bunker sampling, and ensure your crew does too.
👉Like, Comment &
Share this post if you learned something new.
🔔
Follow ShipOpsInsights with Dattaram for deep dives into dry bulk and
shipping operations every week!
⚖️Disclaimer
This article is for educational purposes only and does not
constitute legal or operational advice. Follow your company's protocols and
consult with qualified professionals for specific cases.
 
No comments:
Post a Comment