🚢 Is Your Vessel Port-Ready? Understanding Safety Performance Reviews at Coal Terminals
❓ Is your lifting gear up to
standard for high-performance coal terminals like Port Waratah?
❓ Could one overlooked detail in
your rigging cost you future berths?
❓ Are you prepared to demonstrate
operational improvements to regain terminal approval?
🔍 CLAUSE BREAKDOWN: "Vessel
Suitability – Safety Performance Under Review"
Background:
Port Waratah Coal Services (PWCS) conducts routine reviews of vessels calling
at their terminals, based on the PWCS Coal Terminals Information Handbook.
This evaluation is critical as it directly impacts a vessel's future
suitability to call at the port.
Key Compliance Area in Focus:
In this recent case, the concern centers around secondary support rigging
at the loading berth (K6).
The key issue noted:
- The secondary
support arrangement was rated at only 900 kg, not a Safe Working
Load (SWL).
- PWCS
handbook clearly states: "All components of the rigging
arrangement must have a SWL greater than 2 tonnes." This includes
ropes, pulleys, fittings, davits, vessel cranes, and wires.
Implications:
- Non-compliance
puts the vessel under "Suitability Under Review – Safety
Performance".
- The
vessel faces potential disqualification from future loadings unless
corrective actions are taken.
- Terminal
operators demand a formal Root Cause Analysis (RCA) and Corrective
Action Plan (CAP) covering:
- What
caused the problem?
- How
was it fixed?
- How
will it be prevented in the future?
Common Pitfalls:
- Assuming
manufacturer ratings (instead of certified SWLs) are acceptable.
- Overlooking
secondary support while focusing only on primary rigging.
- Failure
to keep lifting gear certification updated and onboard
documentation accessible.
Real-World Example:
In past cases reviewed by Australian terminal authorities, vessels with
uncertified rigging or ambiguous load-bearing components were rejected from
terminal scheduling for months, leading to commercial losses and charter
disputes.
BIMCO Commentary (where applicable):
BIMCO Time Charter Party clauses often emphasize compliance with terminal
regulations as part of the due diligence obligation on Owners.
Charterers may also invoke "unsuitable vessel" arguments if
terminal compliance is jeopardized.
⚙️ ACTIONABLE STEPS FOR
OPERATORS, MANAGERS & OWNERS:
- Review
Rigging Gear Certifications:
- Ensure
all gear used for support (primary and secondary) has clearly marked
and certified SWLs > 2 tonnes.
- Update
Vessel Rigging Plan:
- Maintain
a detailed rigging and lifting gear layout onboard and submit the same to
charterers/agents in advance.
- Conduct
Internal Safety Audits:
- Before
calling Australian coal terminals, run a pre-port checklist for lifting
gear compliance with terminal guidelines.
- Maintain
Communication:
- In
case of any performance flag, respond proactively with a
well-documented RCA and mitigation plan.
- Train
Crew on Terminal-Specific Expectations:
- Conduct
periodic toolbox meetings before arriving at terminals with strict safety
audits.
📣 CONCLUSION: STAY
PORT-COMPLIANT TO STAY IN THE GAME
Safety standards at coal terminals like Port Waratah aren’t
just technical requirements—they’re business-critical. As a shipping
professional, staying informed and compliant is the key to operational
continuity and avoiding costly delays or blacklisting.
👉 Have you had similar
terminal performance reviews? Share your experience!
📩
Like, comment, and share this blog with your network.
🔔
Subscribe to ShipOps Insights with Dattaram for practical operational
guidance from real-world shipping challenges.
⚠️ Disclaimer:
This blog post is for informational purposes only and
reflects general operational guidance. It does not reference specific vessels
or dates and should not be considered legal or contractual advice. For
compliance and legal decisions, always consult relevant authorities and
terminal regulations.
No comments:
Post a Comment