🚢 Cement & Clinker Cargo: Is Your Vessel Coated for Compliance?
✅ Do you know if your cement
cargo needs slip coating before loading?
✅ Are you aware who pays for
coating materials and application time?
✅ Can improper slip coating put
your charter at legal risk?
📜 Clause Breakdown: Slip
Coating for Cement Clinker / Bulk Cement (NYPE 2015 Format)
When carrying cement clinker or bulk cement, a
special protective barrier—slip coating—may be required inside cargo
holds to prevent damage, cargo residue buildup, and environmental
contamination. The NYPE 2015 slip coating clause clearly outlines
responsibilities and implications for both Owners and Charterers.
🔍 Key Elements of the
Clause:
- Advance
Notification & Confirmation
- Charterers
must inform Owners in advance if slip coating (e.g., lime wash or
equivalent) is required.
- Cost
& Time Allocation
- Charterers
supply the materials at their cost and bear all time used
for application, which still counts as on-hire.
- Application
Responsibility
- The
Vessel's crew, under the Master’s supervision, applies the slip
coating unless otherwise agreed. No off-hire claim arises due to
application.
- Regulatory
Compliance
- Charterers
must ensure coating material is IMO, MARPOL, and locally compliant.
- Post-Discharge
Cleaning
- Charterers
are responsible for cleaning cargo residue if it remains despite
proper slip coating. Any delay or cost from poor or insufficient coating
falls on Charterers.
- Legal
& Environmental Indemnity
- Charterers
warrant full compliance with the IMSBC Code, MARPOL, and local
environmental regulations and indemnify Owners for fines, delays,
or penalties.
⚠️ Common Pitfalls &
Real-Life Implications
- Late
Notification: Delays occur if slip coat requirement is conveyed
post-arrival. Vessel may not be prepared, leading to demurrage claims.
- Non-IMO
Approved Materials: Using non-compliant coatings may lead to port
fines or cargo contamination.
- Improper
Application: If the coating is not applied correctly, cargo residue
can harden on hold surfaces, leading to costly hold cleaning or delays
at the next port.
- Assumed
Off-Hire: Some Charterers mistakenly assume coating application time
is off-hire—it is not.
🧠 BIMCO Commentary
Insight:
BIMCO clauses such as the Cement Cargo Clause and
guidance under the IMSBC Code underscore that cementitious cargoes
require careful handling due to hygroscopic nature and risk of contamination or
residue. Slip coating serves as a protective measure, not a luxury.
🔧 Actionable Steps for
Operators, Managers, Owners & Charterers:
For Charterers:
- ✅
Notify Owners early if slip coating is required.
- ✅
Supply IMO/MARPOL-compliant coating materials.
- ✅
Budget time and costs for application (vessel remains on-hire).
- ✅
Provide clear instructions and technical sheets for coating type.
For Owners/Managers:
- ✅
Ensure crew is trained and equipped for proper application.
- ✅
Document coating process to avoid disputes.
- ✅
Refuse non-compliant materials that risk violating MARPOL/IMO codes.
- ✅
Record hold condition before and after discharge for claims protection.
For Operators:
- ✅
Plan port stays considering coating time.
- ✅
Communicate between Charterers and Vessel to align expectations.
- ✅
Monitor post-discharge cleaning responsibilities to avoid post-voyage
surprises.
🧭 Conclusion &
Call-to-Action
Understanding and properly implementing the Slip Coating
Clause under NYPE 2015 can save you thousands in delays, disputes, and
cleaning costs. Don’t let a layer of lime wash become a mountain of legal risk!
💬 Like what you read?
👍
Hit Like
💬
Drop your comments or case experiences
🔁
Share with your shipping network
🔔
Subscribe to ShipOpsInsight for more expert posts on dry bulk
operations and maritime contract best practices!
📌 Disclaimer:
This blog is for informational purposes only and does
not constitute legal or commercial advice. Readers are encouraged to consult
relevant charter party clauses, classification societies, and legal
professionals for specific guidance.
No comments:
Post a Comment