⚓ Anchoring at Risk? Why Newcastle Anchorage May Cost More Than You Think
❓Three Yes/No Questions to Spark
Curiosity
- Are
you confident your vessel’s anchorage choices are always safe and
commercially sound?
- Could
anchoring in deeper waters expose you to potential liability under the
charter party?
- Have
you reviewed past incidents at Newcastle where vessels lost anchors due to
weather and seabed conditions?
📜 Clause Breakdown &
Operational Context
While this is not a standalone clause in the charter party,
the implications of anchoring decisions fall under “Due Diligence,”
“Seaworthiness,” and “Safe Port/Safe Anchorage” responsibilities—whether
under GENCON, NYPE, or bespoke C/P terms.
🔍 Explanation:
Newcastle anchorage has reported water depths around 100
meters, with sudden weather shifts and a high historical
frequency of anchor/chain losses.
Port agents and operators now recommend NOT anchoring
in the designated anchorage area. Many owners, including RYBM-managed vessels,
routinely wait at EAT (Expected Arrival Time) or drift outside until
berthing instructions are received.
⚠️ Implications:
- Loss
of Anchor/Chain: Can result in significant financial liability
(replacement, delays, salvage operations).
- Grounding
Risk: If vessel drags anchor due to deep water or bad weather, owners
may face hull damage or even environmental claims.
- Deviation
Claims: If the vessel is moved off course to recover or reset anchor.
- Charter
Party Exposure: Claims related to off-hire, delays, or breach of safe
port/anchorage warranties.
💡 Real-World Example:
In multiple Newcastle port calls over the past few years,
vessels have lost anchors due to sudden weather changes while anchored in
>100m depth. One such bulk carrier spent over $250,000 on anchor
retrieval and suffered 3.5 days off-hire.
❌ Common Pitfalls:
- Assuming
“designated anchorage” = “safe anchorage”
- Not
reviewing local weather and bathymetric reports
- Blindly
following NOR tendering timelines
- Failing
to notify charterers about anchoring risks
🧠 Practical Tips
- 📑
Check Port Guidelines: Newcastle’s pilot and VTS authorities often
issue anchorage warnings—get the latest.
- 🛰️
Use Live Weather Feeds & Drift Forecasts: Don’t rely on
yesterday’s report.
- 🛠️
Have a SOP for High-Depth Anchorage: Especially in ports like
Newcastle, Cape Town, Fujairah outer.
- 💬
Master’s Authority: Reinforce the Master’s right to decline
anchoring when conditions are unsafe.
- ⚖️
Notify Charterers in Advance: If anchoring is avoided, clearly
state commercial and safety reasons in writing.
📘 Case Law & BIMCO
Commentary
- The
Evia (No. 2) [1983] 1 AC 736: Clarifies the safe port warranty
includes unforeseen risks like weather or seabed.
- BIMCO
Commentary on NOR Clauses: Reinforces that tendering NOR at unsafe
anchorages can backfire legally.
- ISM
Code Section 7: Requires identifying hazards and taking steps to
mitigate risks under shipboard operations.
📌 Actionable Steps
For Owners/Managers:
- Issue
fleet-wide guidance against anchoring at Newcastle.
- Update
standing orders for high-risk ports with known anchor loss records.
- Ensure
insurance (H&M/P&I) covers deep anchorage risks.
For Masters:
- Refuse
anchorage if depth or weather poses risk; note in logbook.
- Provide
reasoned notification to charterers and agents in writing.
For Charterers:
- Avoid
insisting on NOR tender at unsafe anchorages.
- Respect
Masters’ and Owners’ assessment of anchoring risks.
- Consider
NOR at berth or safe drifting areas when mutually agreed.
🌅 Conclusion
Anchoring is not just a maneuver—it's a maritime risk
decision. As professionals in chartering, ops, or command, the cost of one
wrong anchor drop could be far greater than just off-hire time. With
Newcastle’s well-known anchorage hazards, proactive risk management is not
optional—it’s essential.
📣 Call to Action:
🚢 Have you faced
challenges while anchoring at deep ports like Newcastle?
💬
Share your experiences below.
🔔
Follow ShipOpsInsights with Dattaram for real-world dry bulk ops
lessons.
📢
Like, comment, and forward this to your master mariners and operations teams.
⚠️ Disclaimer:
This blog is for educational and informational purposes only and does not
constitute legal or operational advice. Shipping professionals are encouraged
to refer to their charter party clauses, port regulations, and consult their
legal or P&I representatives for specific operational decisions.
No comments:
Post a Comment