💥 When a Mooring Shift Turned Tragic: Lessons from a Severed Arm Incident
⚓ Why This Case Matters
In the dynamic world of ship operations, even routine tasks
like mooring shifts can turn tragic in an instant. A recent real-life incident
shared by The Swedish Club serves as a stark reminder of the risks involved —
where a simple aft movement led to a longshoreman losing his arm.
Could this have been prevented? Could this happen on your
vessel? Let’s dive in.
❓ Three Questions Before You Read
Further:
- Do
     your mooring crews clearly know their individual roles and safety limits?
- Can
     your crew quickly identify which certificate belongs to which mooring
     line?
- Do
     you conduct toolbox meetings and risk assessments before shifting
     alongside?
⚠️ Incident Summary: What Went
Wrong?
- Vessel:
     Handymax bulk carrier
- Cargo:
     Petcoke
- Location:
     Berth-side loading, shifting aft 10–15 meters to align hold #1
- Situation:
     Vessel shifted by warping using mooring lines (no engine or tug)
- Parties
     Involved: Master, Chief Officer, crew, longshoreman (dockworker), port
     authorities
During the mooring shift, one forward spring line parted
violently, striking a longshoreman. Tragically, the force of the line severed
his arm. Emergency assistance was called immediately, but the severed limb
could not be recovered. Though the longshoreman survived, he was permanently
disabled and unable to return to his job.
The crew had line certificates onboard but could not
match them to the specific ropes in use. The parted line was later
identified as an 8-strand polyamide multi-fibre plaited line. No prior
issues had been reported with the lines.
🧠 Key Questions Raised by
The Club
- Were
     the crew adequately trained in mooring line inspection and handling?
- Did
     the team conduct a toolbox talk or risk assessment for shifting
     alongside?
- Were
     safe zones and no-go areas discussed before operations
     began?
- Were
     line loads monitored, and was the parted line weakened due to
     exposure or wear?
- Did
     the SMS define duties, risk controls, and line certification tracking
     properly?
✅ Major Learnings &
Corrective Actions
👨✈️ Shipboard Lessons:
- The
     crew did not associate line certificates with actual lines in use—a
     major oversight.
- No
     clear system existed to inspect lines for damage before use.
- The
     cadet and bosun were tending the forward winch, but roles were not
     clearly defined.
📘 P&I Club
Recommendations:
- Label
     mooring lines onboard with corresponding certificates for
     traceability.
- Implement
     mandatory toolbox talks before mooring/shifting operations.
- Install
     and monitor line tension systems to avoid overstressing ropes.
- Conduct
     regular training on snap-back zones and mooring dangers.
- Review
     and update SMS to address crew duties, maintenance records, and
     emergency response procedures.
🚢 Conclusion: Don't Let
Routine Turn Risky
Mooring may seem like routine seamanship, but this case
shows how inadequate preparation and unclear responsibilities can have
life-altering consequences.
🔍 Every mooring shift
must be risk-assessed. Every line must be inspected. Every role must be clear.
Let this real-life tragedy be a wake-up call for your
ship operations team to review current practices and plug the gaps before
it's too late.
🔚 Disclaimer:
This article is for informational purposes only. For
incident-specific advice, always consult with your P&I Club or relevant
maritime authority.
#MaritimeSafety #MooringOperations #PandIClub #CrewTraining
#ShipOpsInsight #MarineRisk #SafetyFirst
 
No comments:
Post a Comment